Cummings v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Judge.
Introduction
Samuel Cummings (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.151 (Rule 29.15 Motion) without an evidentiary hearing, arguing that his motion sufficiently alleged facts showing his trial counsel and appellate counsel were ineffective. We affirm.
Background
Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of forcible rape, kidnapping, unlawful use of a weapon, and child molestation in the second degree. These convictions arose out of an incident on July 13, 2007, when the 15-year-old victim…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Steele v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Daryl Davis, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Dyanthany Y. Proudie v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Stafford v. VandergriffDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022