Daryl Davis, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Judge
Introduction
Daryl Davis (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant claims the motion court erred by denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing because Movant alleged facts showing that counsel’s performance was ineffective for (1) failing to strike an allegedly sleeping juror and request the trial court to voir dire the jury regarding whether it was distracted by the sleeping juror and (2) failing to object, and to request an instruction that the jury disregard, the State’s “direct reference” to Movant’s right not to testify during closing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- State v. BarnumSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State v. NeffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- VERNON GEORGE CHRISTIAN, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Carlos Roberts, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- White v. BucknerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022