Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Champlin's Realty Associates v. Tikoian

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 18, 2010No. 2009-113-M.P., 2009-114-M.P., 2009-115-M.PPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRobinson, J.

I readily concur in virtually every aspect of this Court’s opinion in this difficult and very important case,17 except with respect to the Court’s affirmance of the Superior Court’s finding of disqualifying bias on the part of Michael Tikoian.18 I do not lightly dissent (even if only in part) in a case of such obvious importance. Nevertheless, after careful consideration of the facts and the law, I have no choice in good conscience but to dissent; I do so respectfully, but nonetheless quite vigorously.

I am fully persuaded of the correctness of most of the holdings that are so well articulated…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API