Legal Opinion

Bruns v. Capstick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from, the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

This is an action to enforce a mechanics’ lien by the contractor against the owners of the property. The claim sued for amounted in the aggregate to $1,814.57, of which amount $1,225 was claimed to be due by the terms of an express contract, and $626 for extra work, the aggregate being subject to a credit of $26.43. The petition contains biit one count, including both the express contract and the extra work, but the petition was not challenged on that account. The answer, which purports to be filed by both defendants, contains a general denial, and a counterclaim for damages caused to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rude v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  3. Schulenburg & Boeckler Lumber Co. v. StrimpleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Smith v. HaleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bragg v. IsraelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Gazollo v. McCannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API