Legal Opinion

Smith v. Haley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiff, as an. original contractor, brings this action upon a building contract, to recover a balance alleged to be due thereon, for building a house for Mrs. Haley, one of the defendants, and also seeks to enforce a mechanic’s lien upon the house and lot for the balance claimed to be due. The cause was referred to a member of the bar against the objection of the defendant to try all the issues. He heard the evidence of the parties and filed a report, recommending a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of two' hundred and'nine dollars and twenty cents, and that the,same should…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Eyerman v. Mount Sinai Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Shaler v. Van WormerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
  4. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. Hill v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Wayne County v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. Ajax Rubber Co. v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Bruns v. CapstickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Valleroy v. EnrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API