Legal Opinion · Dissent

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1952No. S. F. 18590Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

The opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Bray of the District Court of Appeal and concurred in by Mr. Presiding Justice Peters and Mr. Justice Fred B. Wood of that court, ably sets forth the facts and applicable law. I adopt it as my dissent: '

“Petition to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The sole issue is whether the injury arose out of and was incurred in the course of employment.

Facts

“There is practically no conflict in the evidence. The North Fork Association, comprised of persons enjoying the great out-of-doors, owns a large area in the Sierra. Approximately 25…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API