City of Seattle v. Erickson

The appellant was convicted of the crime of having in his possession, custody and control, with intent *676to sell for human food, milk to which water had been added, contrary to an ordinance of the city of Seattle. From the judgment of conviction, this appeal is prosecuted, and two errors are assigned as grounds for reversal.

First, insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and judgment; and second, error in law in limiting counsel for appellant to fifteen minutes in their argument to the jury. It is conceded that the appellant is engaged in the business of selling and delivering milk…