Legal Opinion

In Re Morford

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 18, 1951PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The petition prays that the respondents be required to show cause why disciplinary measures should not be directed against them. The respondents waived the issuance of a rule and filed their answers to the petition praying that it be dismissed. By stipulation of the parties, the case is to be determined upon the petition, answers and transcript of the testimony taken before the Censor Committee, excluding therefrom the testimony of certain witnesses deemed to be immaterial.

The facts as we find them must be set forth at some length. In January, 1949 one of the respondents, James R.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Short & Walls Lumber Co. v. BlomeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. KraschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Quillen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  5. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API