State v. Parker
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
We consider this case a second time. We first considered it in 1998 as a purported consolidated appeal of the circuit court’s judgment convicting Tyrone G. Parker of second-degree murder and armed criminal action and of its judgment denying Parker’s Rule 29.15 motion for a post-conviction remedy. Because Parker did not did not raise any contentions of trial error, we dismissed his direct appeal and considered only his appeal of the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. State v. Parker, 972 S.W.2d 508 (Mo.App.1998). This court recalled its mandate on December…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ferguson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. VickersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ferguson v. DormireMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State of Missouri v. David E. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.