Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrews

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 24, 1991No. 89 CR 0908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Unfortunately, we apparently were overly optimistic when we asserted our belief in our order of January 23, 1991 (“Andrews IV”) that “the severance chapter of these proceedings is now closed.” United States v. Andrews, 764 F.Supp. 1248, 1251 (N.D.Ill.1991).1 Now before us, however, is the “Government’s Motion to Introduce Evidence Regarding Each Racketeering Act Charged in the Indictment.” What is remarkable about the government’s most recent foray is that, in essence, the government is asking us to reconsider the ruling in Andrews III that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Raymond Luc Levasseur, A/K/A John, Jack, Jake and George, United States v. Raymond Luc Levasseur, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. John R. Barletta, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Ralph Jeff Obregon, Julio Isaac Padron, Nelson Alberto VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. AndrewsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  2. United States v. O'NeillDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
  3. United States v. FlorackDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API