Legal Opinion

United States v. Boyd

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 20, 1993No. 89 CR 908PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

This is the most painful decision that this court has ever been obliged to render, making the crafting of this opinion a sad and difficult undertaking. Mindful of the consequences of our ruling, we would have preferred to have been able to reach a result other than what must be.

Significant questions of prosecutorial misconduct bring “Trial I” defendants Jeff Boyd, Edgar Cooksey, Andrew Craig, Charles Green, Sammy Knox, Felix Mayes and Noah Robinson before this court seeking new trials. Initially, we retained jurisdiction to address the…

2Cases cited96 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeff BoydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Thomas J. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Richard Santiago, A/K/A "Chuco"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. BatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API