Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Campbell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Richardson county. Heard below before Broady, J. cited: Dorrington v. Meyer, 8 Neb., 214; White v. Rourhe, 11 Id., 519 ; Ransom v. Sehmela, 13 Id., 74; Studebaher v. MeCargwr, 20 Id., 504. '

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In the year 1876 the defendant Campbell borrowed $600 from the plaintiff at twenty per cent interest, and, in addition to notes and a mortgage for the sum borrowed, gave five notes of $60 each, secured by mortgage on real estate in Johnson county. Said notes are alike except as to the time of payment, and are in the following form:

“$60. Tecumseh, Neb., February 29, 1876.
“Two years after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of P. D. Cheney sixty dollars, payable at the office of Russell & Holmes, without interest before maturity, with twelve per cent per annum after maturity.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huff v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Cheney v. WoodruffNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Buckner v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawman v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Campbell v. UptonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. J. I. Case Credit Corp. v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API