Buckner v. Jones
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: 1 Pars, on Bills (ed.. 1865), 258, 278; 2 Pars, on Bills, 42, 43, 44; Bayley on Bills (ed. 1836), 104, and note 12; Goodman v. Simonds, 20 Haw. 343; Tuntal v. Barandon, 8 Taun. 100, affirming-Collins v. Martin, 1 Bos. & Pul. 648; Fox on Con., 122 ;- -2 Saunders on PI. (ed. 1837) 670, 672, 673; 1 Stephen’s-N. P. 332, side page 333 ; Bay v. Coddington, 5 Johns. Ch. 54; Morrison v.' McCartney, 30 Mo. 183; Lester r..
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: 1 Pars, on Bills (ed.. 1865), 258, 278; 2 Pars, on Bills, 42, 43, 44; Bayley on Bills (ed. 1836), 104, and note 12; Goodman v. Simonds, 20 Haw. 343; Tuntal v. Barandon, 8 Taun. 100, affirming-Collins v. Martin, 1 Bos. & Pul. 648; Fox on Con., 122 ;- -2 Saunders on PI. (ed. 1837) 670, 672, 673; 1 Stephen’s-N. P. 332, side page 333 ; Bay v. Coddington, 5 Johns. Ch. 54; Morrison v.' McCartney, 30 Mo. 183; Lester r.. Guión, 8 Bush (Ky.), 357; Pacific Law Rep., March 5,, 1872 ; Peacock v. Rhodes, Dougl. (Mich.) 611, 633; Cook v. Jadis, 5 B. & Ad. 909.
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
■ Plaintiff sues for $295, which he says that defendant, received-for plaintiff, and to his use, on October 8, 1870.
Defendant, in his answer, says that at the last-named date-he was a member of the firm of Jones & Sibley; that at that-date one Bingham owed Jones & Sibley $220.73, and at that date borrowed from Jones & Sibley a sum of money, and, in consideration of said previous indebtedness and the money then loaned, did then and there indorse and deliver to Jones & Sibley a certified check for $601.73, drawn by plaintiff upon a bank in Philadelphia, payable to Bingham’s order; that, at the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cheney v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1889