MacChi v. La Rocca
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action for an equal division of certain property acquired by defendant and herself during the period of an illegal marriage. Defendant answered, admitting the illegality of the marriage, the cohabitation of the parties during the period alleged, and the acquisition of the property, but denied that plaintiff contributed one-half of the purchase price thereof and alleged that plaintiff contributed but one-third of said pur chase price and that the remaining two-thirds was contributed by defendant from his own earnings and from a portion of the earnings of his minor son…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Schneider v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Estate of KroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Flanagan v. Capital National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.