Legal Opinion

Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 8, 2005No. 05-C-632-SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHABAZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action for the appointment of an arbitrator pursuant to provisions of the gaming compact between the parties and the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 5, and has moved for an immediate appointment. Defendant has moved to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction and, alternatively, for failure to state a claim because the FAA does not extend to contracts between the state and the tribe and there has not been a “lapse” in the appointment of the arbitrator. The following is a summary of the allegations of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Panzer v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. America's Moneyline, Incorporated v. Josephine ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Pacific Reinsurance Management Corp. v. Ohio Reinsurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API