Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2004No. S122923, S122865Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

KENNARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I concur in the judgment, except insofar as it declares void some 4,000 marriages performed in reliance on the gender-neutral marriage licenses1 issued in the City and County of San Francisco. Although I agree with the majority that San Francisco public officials exceeded their authority when they issued those licenses, and that the licenses themselves are therefore invalid, I would refrain from determining here, in a proceeding from which the persons whose marriages are at issue have been excluded, the validity of the marriages solemnized under those…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API