Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Bearden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1974No. 73-177PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant asserts that the chancery court erred in enjoining him from constructing a funeral home in Rector on a lot acquired by him for that purpose. The error, according to appellant, is in the court’s finding that the vicinity in which the funeral home was to be located was an expanding exclusive residential area which was not in transition to business uses, so that the funeral home would constitute a nuisance. We affirm because we cannot say this finding was clearly against the preponderance of the evidence.

The importance of this finding is delineated in such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fentress v. SicardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Powell v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Blair v. YancySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Howard v. EtchiesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Miller v. JasinskiCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Potter v. Bryan Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Miller-Elston Mortuary, Inc. v. PaalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API