Fentress v. Sicard
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). The authorities are well nigh uniform in holding that a mortuary or undertaking establishment of the kind complained of here is not a nuisance per se. It may become a. nuisance, however, by reason of its location in a residential district or from the manner iii which it is operated. In 46 C. J., p. 726, it is said: “An undertaking establishment or funeral parlor is not a nuisance per se, but by reason of surrounding circumstances it may become a nuisance. It may constitute a nuisance by reason of its location, as, for instance, under particular…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Clutter v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Dawson v. LaufersweilerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Williams v. MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Little Rock v. AndresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Frederick v. Brown Funeral Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.