American Recreation Products, LLC v. Tennier Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge.
American Recreation Products, LLC, (ARP) brings this suit against Tennier Industries, Inc., seeking a declaration that ARP does not infringe a patent held by Tennier. Tennier challenges this court’s personal jurisdiction over it. As set forth in more detail later, I agree that there is no general jurisdiction over Tennier in Missouri and that Tennier’s enforcement actions in Missouri, including cease-and-desist letters, do not provide specific jurisdiction for this patent declaratory judgment action.
Shortly after this case was filed,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Biologix Franchise Marketing Corp. v. Kay Logic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. de la VegaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Enil Jabib Claros v. Sergio Albarran, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Liion, LLC. v. Vertiv Group CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021