Legal Opinion

Tegelaar Bros. v. Hanflig

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an appeal from an order by the Appel*365late Division of District Courts, Northern District, dismissing a report requested by the plaintiff after a trial in the District Court of an action of contract to recover on an account annexed $579.60 for tulip bulbs, ordered by the defendant and shipped from Holland by the plaintiff to the defendant in Newton, Massachusetts, in October, 1930. The answer of the defendant was a general denial, a special answer “that the merchandise sold by the plaintiff to the defendant was defective and therefore of no use to the defendant . . and a paper entitled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hays v. Georgian Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Sayles v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Barnett v. LoudMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greene v. Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Ryder v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Coleman v. C. & P. Homes, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Brantley v. Curtis Automatic Transmission Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Lamb v. SantosMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API