Legal Opinion
Johnson & Johnson v. Herold
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 31, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions
At Law. On contract.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
These actions have been brought to recover sums of money paid by the plaintiffs to the defendants, as successive collectors of internal revenue for the district of New Jersey, for stamps affixed by the plaintiffs to certain articles manufactured by them, which articles were claimed by the United States to be subject to stamp taxes provided for by section 20 and Schedule B of the act of Congress of June 13, 1898 (30 Stat. 456, 462, c. 448 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 2297, 2306]), entitled, “An act to provide ways and means to meet war expenditures and for other purposes.”
Th…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Beloit v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Johnson Co. v. WhartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Cent. Life Ins. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- NJ Turnpike Authority v. SISSELMANNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Rutan v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Beltz v. Great Western Lead Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1918
- People v. McClainAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.