Legal Opinion
Soo v. Lorex Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 9, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01437Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GERALD SOO, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01437-JSC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL 9 v. ARBITRATION AND MOTION TO DISMISS 10 LOREX CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 33 and 34 Defendants. 11 12 13 Gerald Soo and Matthew Lauinger (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class 14 action against Lorex Corporation (“Lorex”) and Dahua Technology USA Inc. (“Dahua”) 15 (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of various state common law claims, violations of 16 California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”),…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.