Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Bowman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1948No. 17,705PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanagan, J.

Appellee was granted an 'absolute divorce from appellant and this appeal followed. The sole assignment of error is the overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial which challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the rulings of the trial court on the introduction and exclusion of certain evidence.

The first proposition urged by appellant is that appellee failed to meet the requirements concerning proof of residence. The statute requires that the petitioner in a divorce proceeding be a bona fide resident of the county for six months and of the state for one year immediately preceding the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Roush v. RoushIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Holmes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawkey v. WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Satterthwaite v. Estate of SatterthwaiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API