Legal Opinion

Hess v. Esperdy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 21, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act (28 U.S.C. § 2201) and Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 1009) seeking review of defendant’s denial of plaintiff Hess’ petition to classify plaintiff Morimoto as a temporary worker under § 101(a) (15) (H) (ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 [8 U.S.C. § 1101(a) (15) (H) (ii)]. Defendant moves for summary judgment and dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P.

Plaintiff Hess is in the sales promotion business in New York City. He has extensive entres in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Board, United States of America v. Federal Maritime BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
  4. United States Ex Rel. Wong Kan Wong v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. United States v. One 1960 FordDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gooch v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Dong Yup Lee v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Gannet Corp. v. StevensDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1968
  4. Rogers v. LarsenDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1976
  5. Joe Gooch and Rafael Bustamante v. Ramsey Clark, Defendants-Respondents. George Meany, in Intervention-Appellants v. Ramsey Clark, Defendants-RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API