Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 131PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff, a freight conductor in defendant’s employ, was injured by being thrown against the door of the caboose in which he was riding. The accident was due to an emergency stop.of the train to avoid passing a passenger train, standing on an adjoining track at a station, receiving and discharging passengers. There are but two questions to be considered on this appeal, first, Was plaintiff, at the time he received the injury engaged in interstate commerce? and, second, Was the evidence of negligence on part of defendant sufficient to be submitted to the jury?

Plain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Kleine v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moseley v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Jarvis v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Rogers v. Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Cocivera v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ReeleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API