Scott v. Hotchkiss
California Supreme Court
Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Matt. F. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant Hotchkiss. The mortgage contains a provision that in case of default and the commencement of an action to foreclose, on the filing of a complaint, in foreclosure, or at any time thereafter, “ the court shall, if requested by the plaintiff, name some disinterested person as receiver and shall authorize such person as receiver to take possession of the mortgaged premises and collect the rents and profits, and to apply them to the satisfaction of such judgment, and to sell said premises in the same manner as lands are sold…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Simpson v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Sexton v. . BreeseNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- West v. ConantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Montgomery v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Baker v. VarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bank of Woodland v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Lewis v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.