Legal Opinion

Tujague v. Atmos Energy Corp.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided July 27, 2006No. Civil Action 05-2733PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

LEMMON, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Atmos Energy Corporation’s (“At-mos”), motion for summary judgment, seeking the court’s determination that plaintiff Frederick August Tuj ague’s (“Tu-jague”) suit is barred by the Louisiana law of liberative prescription, is DENIED. (Document # 5).

I. BACKGROUND

Tuj ague alleges a cause of action for damages based on trespass arising out of Atmos’ installation of a six-inch natural gas pipeline on Tujague’s property along La. Hwy. 1085 without his permission. 1 Tuja-gue alleges that he discovered the trespass in August…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Crump v. Sabine River AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of MosesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. Cooper v. La. Dept. of Public WorksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Dore v. Jefferson Guar. BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aertker v. Placid Holding Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2012
  2. Frank Scurlock v. Kurt Heitmeier, Robert Heitmeier and Eustis Insurance, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  4. Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API