Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 6, 2010No. 2009-CC-2632, 2009-CC-2635Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKnoll, J.

hi join that portion of the majority opinion regarding plaintiffs’ actual or constructive notice. The contamination warning letters from the DEQ should have placed a reasonable person on notice of contamination on their property.

With all due respect, I dissent from the majority’s discussion of the continuing tort claim. The question before this Court is whether the continuing presence of noxious chemicals under the plaintiffs’ land constitutes an ongoing wrongful act, or is merely an ongoing injury resulting from a prior wrongful act (i.e., the leaking gas tank). In accord with both the Civil…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Legal Services Corp. v. VelazquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Anthony J. Nieman v. Nlo, Inc. And Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API