Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Ryzman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), *346entered October 3, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $80,000.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly permitted the plaintiff’s treating physicians to testify at trial, notwithstanding the plaintiff’s failure to provide him with information regarding those physicians pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1) (i).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Overeem v. NeuhoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Summerville v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Putnam v. LamoreauxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lucian v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Malanga v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Butler v. GrimesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Logan v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Arad v. Hanza, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.