Legal Opinion
Celia Da Silva v. Kinsho International Corporation and Haruo Maruyama
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 5, 2000No. 2000PublishedCited by 167 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The issue on this appeal is whether the requirement for Title VII coverage that an employer have at least fifteen employees is an ingredient of subject matter jurisdiction or the merits of the plaintiffs claim. The issue has significance in this case because its resolution determines whether the District Court was entitled to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs pendent state law claims, on which the Defendant prevailed after a jury trial. Plaintiff-Appellant Celia Da Silva appeals from the January 10, 2000, judgment of the United States District…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- David L. Morrison v. Amway Corporation, N.K.A. Alticor, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Magic Carpet Aviation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Christian R. Valencia, an Infant by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Teresa Franco v. Sung M. Lee and Shiu Chun Lee, the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Norma J. Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.