Legal Opinion

D'Alexandris v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.

Plaintiff moves pnrsnant to rule 109 for an order striking out the separate defense.

The plaintiff is a “ qualified ” person and has brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as a pedestrian and inflicted by a hit-and-run driver. In the defense it is alleged that plaintiff has failed to comply with sections 608 and 618 of the Insurance Law in that he failed to make a report of the accident as one caused by an “ unidentified motor vehicle ’ ’ within 24 hours after the occurrence to a police, peace or judicial officer in the vicinity or to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. American Equitable Corp. v. ParkhillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API