Legal Opinion

Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided May 28, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Friedman, J.

The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation *963(MVAIC) provides benefits to a person who is injured in a "hit and run” incident. Where the incident, however, constitutes an intentional vehicular assault MVAIC is not obligated to make payment to the victim. The issue here is at what point MVAIC must raise such a claim. I conclude that in order for MVAIC to avoid payment it must raise such a defense at the time the victim seeks leave to sue MVAIC pursuant to Insurance Law § 5218. If it fails to raise the claim at that time the defense is lost.

On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Valle v. BlackwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Mitchell v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. D'Alexandris v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API