Legal Opinion
Sandiford v. City of New York Department of Education
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 17, 2013PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.
Plaintiff has introduced evidence sufficient to withstand defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing her discrimination and retaliation claims under provisions of the New York City and New York State Human Rights Laws (Administrative Code of City of NY §§ 8-101, 8-107 [1], [7], [13] [a], [b]; Executive Law § 296 [1] [a], [e]) arising out of her *916termination for misconduct as a school aide by the principal of PS 181 in Brooklyn.1
Triable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Richard S. RASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WYATT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the BlindNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bennett v. Health Management Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Furfero v. St. John's UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Singh v. Covenant Aviation Sec., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Kim v. Goldberg, Weprin, Finkel, Goldstein, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Calhoun v. County of HerkimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Averbeck v. Culinary Inst. of Am.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Ramos v. Metro N. Commuter R.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.