Legal Opinion
Hyatt v. Iancu
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 31, 2018No. Civil Action No. 05-2310 (RCL); Civil Action No. 09-1864 (RCL); Civil Action No. 09-1872 (RCL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge *89I. Background
Before the Court is a trio of actions brought under 35 U.S.C. § 145, related to three of Gilbert Hyatt's applications to patent features of his "600-family" and "700-family" specifications that purport to describe innovations Mr. Hyatt made in the field of video processing and associated computing and memory architectures in the mid-1980s. Plaintiff Gilbert P. Hyatt is a prolific inventor who has received more than seventy issued patents and has, pending at various stages of prosecution and appeal, nearly 400 patent applications…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Hyatt v. U.S. Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hyatt v. MatalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Hyatt v. VidalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Mazer v. D.C. Department of HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.