Legal Opinion
Hyatt v. Vidal
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 16, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2009-1872Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GILBERT P. HYATT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 05-cv-2310-RCL Case No. 09-cv-1864-RCL KATHERINE K. VIDAL, in her official Case No. 09-cv-1869-RCL capacity as Under Secretary of Commerce for Case No. 09-cv-1872-RCL Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION When this Court held in 2017 that Plaintiff Gilbert P. Hyatt’s patent applications should not be barred from issuance based on prosecution laches, it did not have the benefit of consulting the Federal Circuit’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kappos v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. And Performance Contracting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Woodbridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.