Legal Opinion

Sena v. Continental Casualty Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1982No. 5292PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

The defendants appeal a judgment in a workmen’s compensation case awarding total and permanent disability and other benefits to the plaintiff. We affirm.

There are two issues on this appeal: 1. Whether the plaintiff’s accidental injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment; and 2. Attorney’s fees.

The trial court entered 38 Findings of Fact regarding the issue of whether the accidental injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. Only one finding, No. 33, has been challenged. The, unchallenged findings show the following facts.

Rafael Sena began…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ensley Ex Rel. Ensley v. GraceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Woodson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ramirez v. Dawson Production Partners, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Mortgage Inv. Co. of El Paso v. GriegoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. DiMatteo v. County of Dona Ana Ex Rel. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Smith v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API