Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Young

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 24, 1911No. Gen. No. 15,225PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frank Crowe, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The plaintiff below, plaintiff in error here, brought suit in the Municipal Court of Chicago against the defendant, defendant in error here, on the following instrument :

‘' $500.00/100 Chicago, Feby. 19, 1906.

Eight months after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of W. E. Brown the sum of Five Hundred Dollars at 3052 Lakeside Building, with interest at 6 per cent per annum, and taxes.

M. B. Early.

Endorsed:

Peter F. Young,

W. E. Brown.”

In regard to the execution and delivery of the instrument, the plaintiff’s agent, Arnold, testified that in February, 1906, he accepted the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pflueger v. Broadway Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  2. First National Bank of Cass Lake v. LamoreauxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  3. Stewart v. McIntoshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API