Stewart v. McIntosh
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett
In an action upon an implied promise to pay a promissory note executed May 1, 1928, for $30,000 with interest, upon trial by .the court there was a finding for defendants with judgment, from which plaintiff appeals. The evidence as to the facts can hardly be said to be conflicting.
Defendants McIntosh and Hannah on February 27, 1926, entered into a trust agreement with the Chicago Title and Trust Company, which bore that company’s number 16289. At that time Hannah was the owner of premises in the city of Chicago known as the northeast corner of State and Chestnut streets, which was subject to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Kingsland v. KoeppeIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Richards v. WarringNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Houghton v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stewart v. McIntoshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Conkling v. McIntoshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944