Legal Opinion

People v. Palmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1989No. C002415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

In United States v. Leon (1984) 468 U.S. 897 [82 L.Ed.2d 677, 104 S.Ct. 3405], the United States Supreme court held that evidence seized pursuant to the service of an invalid search warrant need not be suppressed where police officers serving the warrant relied on its validity in objectively reasonable good faith. (Id., at pp. 916, 922 [82 L.Ed.2d at pp. 694, 698].) The rule of Leon applies in California state courts to determine whether evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant should be suppressed. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 28, subd. (d); In re Lance W. (1985) 37 Cal.3d 873,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. People v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. People v. AlcornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. The People v. WoodallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API