Legal Opinion

Bluebird Baking Co. v. McCarthy

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1935No. 2479PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

This is the final order from which error is prosecuted in this court.

Plaintiff in error in its petition in error sets out nine specifications of error. In the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error these claimed errors) are re-classified under 7 separate headings as follows:(1) It was prejudicial error to permit the examination of a prospective juror on his voir dire as to his interest in an automobile casualty insurance company.(2) The court erred in charging the jury that in awarding damages they could allow recovery for impairment of earning capacity during infancy.(3)…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cusumano v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Prince v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Mikula v. BaloghOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Dennis R. Morley and Marion Schaffer v. Stephen Branca v. Dennis R. Morley, in No. 71-1222. Appeal of Marion Schaffer, in No. 71-1223Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. Hall v. Fairmont Homes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API