Legal Opinion

United States v. Standard Oil Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 25, 1977No. C-52334 SCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CONTI, District Judge.

I. PREFACE.

This action was brought by the United States under Section 4 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 4) alleging that Standard Oil Company of California (SoCal) had violated Section 3 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 3) by engaging, since 1956, in a continuing combination and conspiracy to unreasonably restrain and monopolize the distribution and sale of petroleum products in American Samoa. Specifically, the complaint alleged that SoCal had entered into long term petroleum requirements contracts with the primary nongovernmental…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Stephen Todd Booker v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Occhiuto v. OcchiutoNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  5. United States ex rel. Bonner v. Warden, Stateville Correctional CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API