Tri-Continental Leasing Co. v. Neidhardt
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
This appeal concerns an action for tor-tious interference with a contract. Plaintiff-appellant, Tri-Continental Leasing Company (Tri-Continental) instituted action against the defendants-respondents, Arthur Neidhardt, Louis Levin, and Midwest Petroleum Company (Midwest) alleging that defendants, in some sort of cabal and without justifiable cause, procured the breach of a leasing agreement between the plaintiff and James Rayfield, thereby euchring plaintiff out of a profit. Pursuant to the agreement, Rayfield was to lease commercial laundry equipment from Tri-Continen-tal for a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Downey v. United Weatherproofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Nordstrom v. White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Cady v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Probst Ex Rel. Probst v. SeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- American Business Interiors, Inc. v. Haworth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Marvin Mueller v. James Abdnor, Administrator, Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Pillow v. General American Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Francisco v. Kansas City Star Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Envirotech, Inc. v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.