Legal Opinion

Tri-Continental Leasing Co. v. Neidhardt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 1976No. 37245PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

This appeal concerns an action for tor-tious interference with a contract. Plaintiff-appellant, Tri-Continental Leasing Company (Tri-Continental) instituted action against the defendants-respondents, Arthur Neidhardt, Louis Levin, and Midwest Petroleum Company (Midwest) alleging that defendants, in some sort of cabal and without justifiable cause, procured the breach of a leasing agreement between the plaintiff and James Rayfield, thereby euchring plaintiff out of a profit. Pursuant to the agreement, Rayfield was to lease commercial laundry equipment from Tri-Continen-tal for a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Downey v. United Weatherproofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Nordstrom v. White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cady v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Probst Ex Rel. Probst v. SeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. American Business Interiors, Inc. v. Haworth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Marvin Mueller v. James Abdnor, Administrator, Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Pillow v. General American Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Francisco v. Kansas City Star Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Envirotech, Inc. v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API