Legal Opinion

United States v. Wade

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 18, 2018No. 17-3177PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Jason Wade pled guilty for a second time to possessing child pornography. The district judge imposed a sentence of 132 months' imprisonment, though the mandatory minimum and guidelines recommendation was 120 months. Wade argues that the judge procedurally erred by not addressing Wade's mitigation arguments or explaining the upward variance. In the alternative, he argues that his sentence was substantively unreasonable. Because the judge responded to Wade's mitigation arguments, adequately justified Wade's sentence, and did not abuse his discretion, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

FBI agents seized…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. OmoleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Jonathan StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Marcus DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Deaunta TylerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. Ashantae CorruthersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
  5. United States v. Ashantae CorruthersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API