United States v. Wade
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Jason Wade pled guilty for a second time to possessing child pornography. The district judge imposed a sentence of 132 months' imprisonment, though the mandatory minimum and guidelines recommendation was 120 months. Wade argues that the judge procedurally erred by not addressing Wade's mitigation arguments or explaining the upward variance. In the alternative, he argues that his sentence was substantively unreasonable. Because the judge responded to Wade's mitigation arguments, adequately justified Wade's sentence, and did not abuse his discretion, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
FBI agents seized…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. OmoleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Jonathan StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Marcus DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Deaunta TylerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Ashantae CorruthersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
- United States v. Ashantae CorruthersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.