Whetstone v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WHITHAM, Justice.
William Whetstone appeals from orders revoking his probation on two felony theft charges and sentencing him to concurrent five-year prison terms. Appellant asserts that both indictments were fundamentally defective because they failed to allege all the elements of a criminal offense. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgments and dismiss both indictments.
These appeals were submitted without the benefit of a statement of facts. The *651transcripts, however, reflect that appellant pleaded guilty in 1984 to two third-degree felony theft charges. The trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Posey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ex Parte MillardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ex Parte BarceloCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Tweedy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whetstone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Milam v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Murk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Murk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Murk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989