Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Integra National Bank/Pittsburgh (In re Fiscante)

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1992No. Bankruptcy No. 91-173 JLC; Adv. No. 92-30PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSEPH L. COSETTI, Chief Judge.

The matter before this court is a motion by Sears, Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”) for relief from the automatic stay and/or turnover of property. After careful review of the record and the representations made by the parties, the motion for relief is denied.

I. FACTS

On or about May 18, 1989, Cosmo Nick Fiscante (“Debtor”) purchased a lawn tractor and charged it to his personal charge account with Sears. The purchase price of the lawn tractor was $1,481.81. The lawn tractor was subsequently delivered to the Debtor’s place of business, Trackers Raceway…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Pettit (In Re Pettit)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1981
  2. In Re PipesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
  3. Gallatin National Bank v. Lockovich (In Re Lockovich)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hazlett v. Suburban Tractor Co. (In Re Palmer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  2. Nelson v. John Deere Credit (In Re Troupe)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API