Legal Opinion

Estate of Rosencrantz: McIver v. Kane

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

Under sec. 310.10 (sec. 3791), Stats., the county court is declared to have power to take proof of the execution and validity of lost wills and to establish the same. This, contrary to respondent’s suggestion, requires that there shall be the same proof of execution of any alleged lost or destroyed will as would be required in a contest over the probate of a document offered as the original. The proponent of a lost or destroyed will cannot stand in any better position than one who offers an original document so far as the necessity of proof of execution is concerned.

The appellant urges here…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. MalmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Will of JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Will of JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Foxen v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Anderson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Capps v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Will of Garrecht v. WillisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API