Siguenza v. Citizens Property Insurance Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentSchwartz, Senior Judge
As the majority points out, the policy requires the insured to give “prompt notice to Citizens or your producer.” Despite Mrs. Siguenza’s repetitive, unqualified deposition testimony that she called Citizens,3 the majority concludes that a material question of fact exists as to whether she actually notified the agent instead. It relies on the following dialogue during Mrs. Siguenza’s deposition:
Q. Do you recall if you called the actual insurance company or your insurance agent, the person that you obtained insurance from?
A. That’s the insurance company.
Q. Pardon?
A. The insurance company.
Q.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Ellison v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Rocamonde v. Marshalls of Ma, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Elison v. GoodmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Murciano v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.