Legal Opinion
Rocamonde v. Marshalls of Ma, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 9, 2011No. 3D10-1088PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.
This is an appeal of a summary final judgment entered in favor of Marshalls of Ma, Inc. Finding that genuine issues of material fact remain, we reverse.
On February 2, 2007, Appellant, Maria Rocamonde (Rocamonde) sustained injuries when she tripped over a mobile clothing rack within Appellee’s premises (Marshalls). Rocamonde filed a negligence action against Marshalls, alleging that Marshalls breached its duty to operate and maintain the store in a reasonably safe condition, free from dangerous *864conditions or concealed perils within its premises or in failing to warn of such conditions.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Williams v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Earley v. Morrison Cafeteria Co. of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Pittman v. Volusia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Thomas Brookie v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. and The Lewis Bear CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Dominguez v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Ramsey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Fuentes v. Sandel, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Francis v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.