Legal Opinion
United States v. May
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 7, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-72802PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEIKENS, Chief Judge.
The government brings this action seeking an injunction barring May from engaging in illegal, false, misleading and deceptive conduct which interferes with proper administration of the Internal Revenue laws. I granted the government’s motion for a preliminary injunction on September 13, 1982. The government now moves for summary judgment in the form of a permanent injunction. This opinion explains my reasons for granting both interlocutory and permanent relief.
The government wants May enjoined from engaging in three activities: (1) distributing forms which he…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rowlee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Beard v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- United States v. Ernst & Whinney, a General PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. David White, Individually and Doing Business as Minnesota Society for Educated CitizensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Music Masters, Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.