Vaughan v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Thomas
— Affirming.
Thie sole question involved on this appeal is whether' or not a foreign railroad corporation which was incorporated in the .state creating it long before the adoption of our present Constitution and which from about that time owned and operated a portion of one of its railroad lines located in this state and had also long sinci© complied with sections 570 and 841 of our statutes entitling it to “possess, control, maintain or operate” a railroad in this state, must pay the organization tax of one-tenth of one per. centum of its capital stock, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Omaha National Bank v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Knight v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Omaha National Bank v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1953