Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 24, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

— Affirming.

Thie sole question involved on this appeal is whether' or not a foreign railroad corporation which was incorporated in the .state creating it long before the adoption of our present Constitution and which from about that time owned and operated a portion of one of its railroad lines located in this state and had also long sinci© complied with sections 570 and 841 of our statutes entitling it to “possess, control, maintain or operate” a railroad in this state, must pay the organization tax of one-tenth of one per. centum of its capital stock, as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1862

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Omaha National Bank v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Knight v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Omaha National Bank v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API